Waste-derived fuels

The overall priority for cement makers is the safe manufacture of high quality cement. The UK cement industry is committed to achieving this objective in a sustainable way: environmentally, socially and economically. To achieve greater sustainability, it is essential that all available resources are used efficiently and effectively. The cement industry considers wastes, with some exceptions, to be alternative resources awaiting an appropriate use and is actively pursuing beneficial use within its manufacturing processes. The UK Government has committed itself to the EU Landfill Directive and other international agreements that aim to reduce disposal of wastes to landfill and to recovering energy and materials from used tyres, packaging wastes, solvents and many other waste streams. The UK cement industry is, therefore, playing a vital role in helping to achieve the UK's environmental objectives by utilising appropriate wastes as alternative fuels and raw materials in the manufacture of cement, via industrial ecology.
 
Click on the links below for answers:
 
Which wastes are used as alternative fuels?
Traditionally, fossil fuels (coal, petroleum coke [petcoke] and a limited amount of gas and oil) have been burnt to generate the temperatures of around 1,450oC needed to produce cement. Throughout the world alternative fuels have been used for many years to partially replace fossil fuels in cement manufacture. In the UK, alternative fuels are carefully specified and sourced from amongst: used tyres (whole or chipped), secondary liquid fuels (recycled inks, solvents, thinners, oils and residues), packaging wastes (non-recyclable paper, cardboard and plastics), and, to a limited extent, sewage sludge (pellets). On a mass basis, fuel accounts for only 10% of the 'throughput' of a cement kiln; the rest comprises raw/mineral materials. On a thermal basis, the level of replacement of fossil fuels by alternatives is only 6% averaged over the UK whereas it is up to 50% in some EU countries. Alternative fuels, like fossil fuels, are predominantly hydrocarbons which, when burnt during cement manufacture, are almost entirely decomposed to carbon dioxide and water with insignificant amounts of more complex carbon-based compounds 1. A very small residue or ash is formed from liquid fuels, larger quantities will be formed from solid fuels but all are chemically bound in cement clinker. In particular, tyres burn to give a residue that is mainly iron, thus reducing the need for additional iron ore to be added as a raw material component.
 
Which wastes are used as alternative raw materials?
Portland cement, the major type of cement, is made from mixtures of mainly natural mineral materials, principally chalk/limestone and clay/shale. These raw materials can be partially replaced by wastes and by-products from other industries in order to 'fine tune' the overall chemical composition. Conversely, additional amounts of natural minerals would have to be added to achieve this 'fine tuning' requirement. Alternative raw materials currently in use are: power station fly ash, foundry sand, mill scale (steel production) and iron from used tyres. Less commonly, china clay wastes and colliery shale have been used. Work is also underway to introduce wastes rich in silica, iron, alumina and lime minerals from, for example, the water and automotive industries. The alternative raw materials used are mainly inorganic in nature, carefully sourced and subject to specifications to which suppliers must comply. Alternative raw materials are processed through the high temperature kilns (solids at 1,450oC, flames at 2,000oC) in exactly the same way as natural materials.
 
How is using waste as fuel in cement manufacture regulated in the UK?
The cement industry is primarily regulated by the European IPPC Directive 2 implemented in England, Wales and Scotland through the Pollution Prevention and Control Regulations 2000, together with the Hazardous Waste Incineration Directive 3 and now the Waste Incineration Directive 4. Additionally, the Environment Agency (EA) places specific demands on the cement industry through its Substitute Fuels Protocol (SFP) as modified by the Tyres Protocol.  The Environment Agency is responsible for issuing licences or 'permits' to cement kilns in England and Wales whereas the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) is responsible for Scotland. In order for a 'permit' to be granted for burning a non-fossil fuel the EA/SEPA requires an 'environmental assessment' to be carried out to demonstrate that the impact of the factory when using the waste will be no greater (and in reality less) than when using traditional resources.
 
How is stakeholder dialogue undertaken in the UK?
The introduction of changes to long-established operations such as cement works can cause interest, or sometimes concern, amongst communities and other stakeholders. The cement industry engages with all interested stakeholders through regular, open communications about any aspect of its operations. The cement industry's key stakeholders include the neighbours/local communities, employees, customers, shareholders, regulators, 'green' issue interests and those who depend on the industry for their livelihood. However, experience has shown that the stakeholders who become most involved are the local communities and the regulatory bodies.

When any proposal is made to use an alternative fuel the cement manufacturer will include it in its open dialogue with stakeholders. This is done at the earliest possible opportunity through established 'open door' policies, formal open days, liaison committees and newsletters. During trials, reports on progress may be published weekly, supported by opportunities for interested groups to see the fuel being used at first hand.

The elements that make up the regular dialogue develop with the communities' involvement, which brings advantages to both parties. Manufacturers are better able to incorporate feedback into their plans and the transparency of the process means that the community is involved, consulted and reassured.
 
Does using wastes as fuel and raw materials have any effect on cement quality?
The main indicators of cement quality are the requirements for mechanical, physical and chemical properties and are standardised in European/national product specifications 5. These requirements must be met regardless of either the type of fuel used or the nature of the raw materials. These properties are measured and monitored continually, under independent third party scrutiny, in order to ensure that cement conforms to its specification and can be legally placed on the market. The use of wastes has no effect on these major properties because any potential effects will have been accounted for by making compensatory adjustments to the chemical composition of the raw material fed to the kiln.

Does the industry go beyond regulation to ensure safety?

The UK cement industry goes beyond properties and 'qualities' that are not specification requirements in order to fulfil its own commitments to health and safety. For example, the 'heavy metals profiles' are measured using the most sophisticated analytical instruments available (e.g. inductively-coupled plasma techniques such as ICP-MS and ICP-AES). Although the quantities of individual heavy metals contributed from different wastes and different traditional materials can vary, the levels in the cement are always in the 'parts per million' (ppm) to the 'parts per billion' (ppb) ranges and of little consequence.
 
In the case of any organic/carbon-based substances, there are no known compounds, whether present in fuels or as contaminants of raw materials, which can survive thermal decomposition at the temperatures of cement kilns and still be found in measurable amounts in the final cement.

Does using wastes as fuel and raw materials have any effect on concrete performance? Is durability affected?

The recovery of wastes as alternative fuels and raw materials in cement manufacture is a mature practice in many countries e.g. United States, Germany, Belgium, France and Switzerland. To date, there have been no problems of concrete performance related to their use. Indeed, it is extremely unlikely that any durability problems will ever emerge given the tight specification of 'kiln inputs' and 'kiln outputs' and the compositional congruence of cements made with or without waste materials.
 
The UK cement industry is not, however, complacent and in any durability investigations that are undertaken, cements made using alternative fuels and alternative raw materials are included.

Does leaching occur?

Irrespective of the cement type or its process of production, the quantities of heavy metals, or organics, leached have generally been at, or below, the limits of detection (LOD) of the sensitive analytical instruments used. Where they have been detected, they have been present at orders of magnitude less than any regulatory 'maximum admissible concentrations' 7.
 
Leaching tests, of various types, carried out on 'monoliths' (solid specimens with formed surfaces) of hardened mortar and hardened concretes in the UK 6,
USA 7, and France 1 have shown that it is not possible to distinguish between cements made with traditional fuels and raw materials from those made with partial substitution of alternatives.

Further information

For more information on waste-derived fuels, contact the British Cement Association.
 

References and background reading

1. Incinerating waste in the kiln of a cement works does not affect the use of cements, Association Technique de L'industrie des Liants Hydrauliques (ATILH), 1994

2. Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution and control

3. Council Directive 94/67/EC hazardous waste incineration [until superseded on 28 December 2005]

4. Council Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste

5. British Standards Institution/European Standards Organisation BS EN 197-1 : 2000, Cement-Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements

6. Improved materials testing, Leaching tests on ready-mixed concrete, Report to the UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, DETR/DWI No. 4551/1, 1998

7. A comparison of metal and organic concentrations in cement and clinker made with fossil fuels to cement and clinker made with waste derived fuels, Colucci M, Epstein P and Bartley B, NSF International, Portland Cement Association, 1993